co-founder palma.ai
What kind of AI adoption leader are you?
ChatGPT has taken the world by storm. 50% of companies in the US currently already use ChatGPT where half of those have realized average savings of $75,000 since starting to use AI and have been able to increase team efficiencies in order to minimize hiring activities or even reduce headcount. Nearly all of the questioned companies intend to expand the usage of AI significantly in 2024.
If you are reading this, it’s likely you already realize that using a GenAI like ChatGPT can provide you with a clear competitive advantage compared to those who may still be lagging in adoption. Perhaps you have already allowed your teams to use ChatGPT for work and are currently excited about all that it can do for your internal productivity. In that case, you have undoubtedly also thought about what kind of prompts your teams might be entering into the AI service:
Are they thinking about being careful with what they might copy-paste out of emails, marketing content, or internal documents?
Think about every time you use ChatGPT—how often do you copy-paste something out of an email, a document, a website, or any number of sources?
How often does that contain information that could be considered sensitive and would, in a normal email, never be sent to an unknown server?
Exactly—probably quite often!
So what typically happens next often depends on the type of leaders an organization has.
In our experience, there are 3 different types of leaders:
The unrestricted:
These leaders often let their teams run with GenAI technologies without any oversight over what data gets posted into public services. Often, the argument centers around "how likely is it anyway that it will come out?".
The overly careful:
These leaders understand the inherent risks of public GenAI technologies and will often block any access to ChatGPT on corporate networks and devices. "No risk if you can't use it!" These leaders will often wait for more mature approaches to GenAI.
The "let’s do it ourselves" leader:
Realizing the value of LLMs, these leaders mitigate risks by using open-source models that run on internal infrastructure, providing the organization with no potential for data leaks while still benefiting from the capabilities of LLMs.
Let’s address the pros and cons of each approach and subsequently provide a solution for all three of these leaders (spoiler alert: it’s palma.ai):
A Solution for All: palma.ai
palma.ai offers a unique and easy solution that integrates seamlessly with existing LLM workflows, providing an added layer of security through a browser extension when using GenAI technologies like ChatGPT. It ensures sensitive data is identified and filtered out before it can be processed by public or even internal AI models. palma.ai also provides organizations with a dashboard to monitor the continuous activities of teams on AI platforms.
For the Unrestricted Leader, palma.ai introduces a safety net, enabling innovation and rapid adoption of AI technologies while mitigating the risks of data exposure.
For the Overly Careful Leader, palma.ai offers a compromise, allowing them to embrace the advantages of AI technologies without fully exposing their organization to perceived risks.
For the "Let’s Do It Ourselves" Leader, palma.ai complements their in-house approach by providing security for the public component of their AI strategy.
In conclusion, palma.ai serves as a bridge between innovation and security, enabling organizations to leverage AI technologies to their full potential while ensuring that their data remains protected.